Myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
17 min read
Summary
Background
Myopericarditis is a rare complication of vaccination. However, there have been increasing reports of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, especially among adolescents and young adults. We aimed to characterise the incidence of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, and compare this with non-COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching four international databases from Jan 1, 1947, to Dec 31, 2021, for studies in English reporting on the incidence of myopericarditis following vaccination (the primary outcome). We included studies reporting on people in the general population who had myopericarditis in temporal relation to receiving vaccines, and excluded studies on a specific subpopulation of patients, non-human studies, and studies in which the number of doses was not reported. Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian and Laird) were conducted, and the intra-study risk of bias (Joanna Briggs Institute checklist) and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach) were assessed. We analysed the difference in incidence of myopericarditis among subpopulations, stratifying by the type of vaccine (COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19) and age group (adult vs paediatric). Among COVID-19 vaccinations, we examined the effect of the type of vaccine (mRNA or non-mRNA), sex, age, and dose on the incidence of myopericarditis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021275477).
Findings
The overall incidence of myopericarditis from 22 studies (405 272 721 vaccine doses) was 33·3 cases (95% CI 15·3–72·6) per million vaccine doses, and did not differ significantly between people who received COVID-19 vaccines (18·2 [10·9–30·3], 11 studies [395 361 933 doses], high certainty) and those who received non-COVID-19 vaccines (56·0 [10·7–293·7], 11 studies [9 910 788 doses], moderate certainty, p=0·20). Compared with COVID-19 vaccination, the incidence of myopericarditis was significantly higher following smallpox vaccinations (132·1 [81·3–214·6], p<0·0001) but was not significantly different after influenza vaccinations (1·3 [0·0–884·1], p=0·43) or in studies reporting on various other non-smallpox vaccinations (57·0 [1·1–3036·6], p=0·58). Among people who received COVID-19 vaccines, the incidence of myopericarditis was significantly higher in males (vs females), in people younger than 30 years (vs 30 years or older), after receiving an mRNA vaccine (vs non-mRNA vaccine), and after a second dose of vaccine (vs a first or third dose).
Interpretation
The overall risk of myopericarditis after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine is low. However, younger males have an increased incidence of myopericarditis, particularly after receiving mRNA vaccines. Nevertheless, the risks of such rare adverse events should be balanced against the risks of COVID-19 infection (including myopericarditis).
Funding
None.
Results
- Montgomery J
- Ryan M
- Engler R
- et al.
,
- Mevorach D
- Anis E
- Cedar N
- et al.
,
- Bozkurt B
- Kamat I
- Hotez PJ
,
- Fleming-Nouri A
- Haimovich AD
- Yang D
- Schulz WL
- Coppi A
- Taylor RA
,
COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report.
,
- Arness MK
- Eckart RE
- Love SS
- et al.
,
- Chua GT
- Kwan MYW
- Chui CSL
- et al.
,
- Diaz GA
- Parsons GT
- Gering SK
- Meier AR
- Hutchinson IV
- Robicsek A
,
- Eckart RE
- Love SS
- Atwood JE
- et al.
,
- Engler RJ
- Nelson MR
- Collins Jr, LC
- et al.
,
- Grabenstein JD
- Winkenwerder Jr, W
,
- Hansen J
- Goddard K
- Timbol J
- et al.
,
Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada.
,
- Husby A
- Hansen JV
- Fosbøl E
- et al.
,
- Kuntz J
- Crane B
- Weinmann S
- Naleway AL
,
- Mayet A
- Haus-Cheymol R
- Bouaiti EA
- et al.
,
- McMahon AW
- Zinderman C
- Ball R
- Gupta G
- Braun MM
,
- McNeil MM
- Cano M
- Miller ER
- Petersen BW
- Engler RJ
- Bryant-Genevier MG
,
Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine adverse reactions.
,
- Millman AJ
- Reynolds S
- Duffy J
- Chen J
- Gargiullo P
- Fry AM
,
HSA’s safety update #8: COVID-19 vaccines (30 December 2020 – 30 November 2021).
,
- Sniadack MM
- Neff LJ
- Swerdlow DL
- Schieber RA
- McCauley MM
- Mootrey GT
11 studies reported on 395 361 933 doses of COVID-19 vaccines,
- Montgomery J
- Ryan M
- Engler R
- et al.
,
- Mevorach D
- Anis E
- Cedar N
- et al.
,
- Bozkurt B
- Kamat I
- Hotez PJ
,
- Fleming-Nouri A
- Haimovich AD
- Yang D
- Schulz WL
- Coppi A
- Taylor RA
,
COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report.
,
- Chua GT
- Kwan MYW
- Chui CSL
- et al.
,
- Diaz GA
- Parsons GT
- Gering SK
- Meier AR
- Hutchinson IV
- Robicsek A
,
Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada.
,
- Husby A
- Hansen JV
- Fosbøl E
- et al.
,
Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine adverse reactions.
,
HSA’s safety update #8: COVID-19 vaccines (30 December 2020 – 30 November 2021).
six studies reported on 2 900 274 doses of smallpox vaccines,
- Arness MK
- Eckart RE
- Love SS
- et al.
,
- Eckart RE
- Love SS
- Atwood JE
- et al.
,
- Grabenstein JD
- Winkenwerder Jr, W
,
- McMahon AW
- Zinderman C
- Ball R
- Gupta G
- Braun MM
,
- McNeil MM
- Cano M
- Miller ER
- Petersen BW
- Engler RJ
- Bryant-Genevier MG
,
- Sniadack MM
- Neff LJ
- Swerdlow DL
- Schieber RA
- McCauley MM
- Mootrey GT
two studies on 1 521 782 doses of influenza vaccines,
- Hansen J
- Goddard K
- Timbol J
- et al.
,
- Millman AJ
- Reynolds S
- Duffy J
- Chen J
- Gargiullo P
- Fry AM
and three studies on a variety of non-COVID-19 vaccines (such as varicella; yellow fever; oral polio vaccine; measles, mumps, and rubella; meningococcal; diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus; BCG; hepatitis; and typhoid; 5 488 732 doses).
- Engler RJ
- Nelson MR
- Collins Jr, LC
- et al.
,
- Kuntz J
- Crane B
- Weinmann S
- Naleway AL
,
- Mayet A
- Haus-Cheymol R
- Bouaiti EA
- et al.
Across the nine studies that specified the type of COVID-19 vaccine, 290 730 653 doses of mRNA vaccines and 51 969 677 doses of non-mRNA vaccines were administered. Definitions of pericarditis, myocarditis, and myopericarditis in individual studies or databases are summarised in the appendix (pp 10-17). The intra-study risk of bias and GRADE assessment are also provided in the appendix (pp 18–20); apart from one study,
- Fleming-Nouri A
- Haimovich AD
- Yang D
- Schulz WL
- Coppi A
- Taylor RA
all studies were of good quality (JBI score >7).
Figure 1Flow diagram of study identification and inclusion
Figure 2Incidence of myopericarditis following vaccination in studies investigating COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccines
The pooled incidence of myopericarditis following vaccination was 18·2 cases per million doses of COVID-19 vaccine and 56·0 cases per million doses of non-COVID-19 vaccine (p=0·20).
Figure 3Incidence of myopericarditis following vaccination in studies investigating mRNA and non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines
The pooled incidence of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was 22·6 cases per million doses of mRNA vaccine and 7·9 cases per million doses of non-mRNA vaccine (p=0·0010).
TableSubgroup analyses among people who received COVID-19 vaccines
- Mevorach D
- Anis E
- Cedar N
- et al.
,
- Bozkurt B
- Kamat I
- Hotez PJ
,
- Fleming-Nouri A
- Haimovich AD
- Yang D
- Schulz WL
- Coppi A
- Taylor RA
,
COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report.
,
- Chua GT
- Kwan MYW
- Chui CSL
- et al.
Figure 4Effect of age on incidence of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination
Strata-level meta-regression between age and logit-transformed robust-variance estimated incidence of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Bubble sizes correspond to the weights of each study, which are computed as an inverse of the SE of the strata-level pooled estimate. Horizontal error bars correspond to the range of ages that each strata represents. Excluding people younger than 12 years, for whom few data were reported in the studies included, the incidence of myopericarditis increases as the mean age of each subgroup decreases.
- Bhatia KS
- van Gaal W
- Kritharides L
- Chow CK
- Bhindi R
,
- Boehmer TK
- Kompaniyets L
- Lavery AM
- et al.
,
- Buckley BJR
- Harrison SL
- Fazio-Eynullayeva E
- Underhill P
- Lane DA
- Lip GYH
,
- Clark DE
- Parikh A
- Dendy JM
- et al.
,
- Cordeanu EM
- Duthil N
- Severac F
- et al.
,
- Cuomo G
- Puzzolante C
- Iadisernia V
- et al.
,
- Daniels CJ
- Rajpal S
- Greenshields JT
- et al.
,
- Daugherty SE
- Guo Y
- Heath K
- et al.
,
- Deng Q
- Hu B
- Zhang Y
- et al.
,
- Doyen D
- Dupland P
- Morand L
- et al.
,
- Finn A
- Jindal A
- Selvaraj V
- Authelet N
- Gutman NH
- Dapaah-Afriyie K
,
- Hendrickson BS
- Stephens RE
- Chang JV
- et al.
,
- Knight DS
- Kotecha T
- Razvi Y
- et al.
,
- Kunal S
- Sharma SM
- Sharma SK
- et al.
,
- Laganà N
- Cei M
- Evangelista I
- et al.
,
- Linschoten M
- Peters S
- van Smeden M
- et al.
,
- Mostafavi A
- Tabatabaei SAH
- Zamani Fard S
- Majidi F
- Mohagheghi A
- Shirani S
,
- Trimaille A
- Ribeyrolles S
- Fauvel C
- et al.
,
- Wang H
- Li R
- Zhou Z
- et al.
,
- Weckbach LT
- Curta A
- Bieber S
- et al.
,
- Zeng JH
- Wu WB
- Qu JX
- et al.
among whom there were 48 904 cases of myopericarditis (1·1% [95% CI 0·5–2·2]; appendix p 37).
Discussion
Our systematic review and meta-analysis shows that the incidence of myopericarditis in people who received COVID-19 vaccines was not significantly different from that in people who received non-COVID-19 vaccines in general, and was lower than that in people who received smallpox vaccines. Thus, the overall risk of myopericarditis appears to be no different for this very new group of vaccines against COVID-19 than for traditional vaccines against other pathogens. We also found that young men have a higher incidence of myopericarditis than others receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations.
- Li X
- Ostropolets A
- Makadia R
- et al.
,
- Halsell JS
- Riddle JR
- Atwood JE
- et al.
,
- Lin AH
- Phan HA
- Barthel RV
- et al.
and it is possible that it has been underestimated because of the existence of subclinical myopericarditis.
WHO pharmaceuticals newsletter—N°4, 2021.
Overall, the background incidence of myopericarditis is estimated to be between 9·5 and 21·6 per million people per month,
- Halsell JS
- Riddle JR
- Atwood JE
- et al.
,
- Lin AH
- Phan HA
- Barthel RV
- et al.
whereas the expected incidence of myopericarditis in vaccine recipients was 2·4 to 550 per million vaccinees.
- Gubernot D
- Jazwa A
- Niu M
- et al.
In our meta-analysis, the incidence of myopericarditis following vaccination was 18·2 cases (95% CI 10·9–30·3; 8·9 cases of myocarditis and 10·1 cases of pericarditis) per million COVID-19 vaccine doses and 56·0 (10·7–293·7) per million doses of non-COVID-19 vaccines. The background incidence of myocarditis is 8·3–16·7 per million people per month
WHO pharmaceuticals newsletter—N°4, 2021.
and of pericarditis is 4·78–21·67 per million people per month.
- Kumar N
- Pandey A
- Jain P
- Garg N
,
- Mody P
- Bikdeli B
- Wang Y
- Imazio M
- Krumholz HM
Notably, the specific incidence of myopericarditis after smallpox vaccination was significantly higher than after COVID-19 vaccines, and the incidence following influenza and other vaccines was similar to that following COVID-19 vaccines. The studies reporting on smallpox vaccination were primarily done in US military personnel, most of whom would be young men, and could account for the increased incidence of myopericarditis in smallpox vaccinees. The increased incidence of myopericarditis after non-COVID-19 vaccination might suggest that myopericarditis is a side-effect of the inflammatory processes induced by vaccination and is not uniquely a result of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins through COVID-19 vaccination or infection. The risks of such infrequent adverse events are outweighed by the benefits of vaccination, which include a lower risk of infection, hospitalisation, severe disease, and death from COVID-19.
- McNamara LA
- Wiegand RE
- Burke RM
- et al.
,
- Tenforde MW
- Self WH
- Adams K
- et al.
In people aged 30 years or older, the incidence of post-vaccination myopericarditis was 2·9 cases (95% CI 1·8–4·7) per million vaccine doses. Being aware of a possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and myopericarditis, clinicians might have had an inherently lower threshold for investigating a patient with non-specific chest pain after COVID-19 vaccination, eventually leading to a diagnosis of myopericarditis. Additionally, given current robust vaccine surveillance systems and the fact that COVID-19 vaccines have received a much higher degree of scrutiny than previous vaccines, the possibility of relative under-reporting of adverse events following non-COVID-19 vaccinations cannot be excluded, despite mass vaccination of more than 6 billion people in the past year.
- Dagan N
- Barda N
- Balicer RD
,
- Bozkurt B
- Kamat I
- Hotez PJ
Previous studies have shown that myocarditis after the second dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine occurs clinically in approximately one in 10 000 young males,
COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report—02-12-2021.
which is approximately 50–100 times higher than expected (based on claims made in 2017–19 from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Research Database).
- Oster ME
- Shay DK
- Su JR
- et al.
In the general population before the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of myocarditis was generally higher in males, and highest in young adults.
- Kytö V
- Sipilä J
- Rautava P
,
Thus far, guidelines for COVID-19 vaccine-induced myopericarditis have mainly focused on early diagnosis and treatment,
COVID-19 vaccination: myocarditis and pericarditis information for healthcare professionals.
,
COVID-19 vaccination—guidance on myocarditis and pericarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
,
COVID-19 subcommittee of the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS): updated guidance regarding myocarditis and pericarditis reported with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
,
Clinical considerations: myocarditis and pericarditis after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among adolescents and young adults.
while some have recommended avoiding strenuous exercise for 2 weeks following vaccination.
Expert committee on COVID-19 vaccination: updates of assessment on myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
Several national guidelines also highlight the indications and contraindications for vaccine subtypes in this context.
COVID-19 vaccination—guidance on myocarditis and pericarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
,
Expert committee on COVID-19 vaccination: updates of assessment on myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
Although the prognosis of this self-limiting condition is generally good, long-term outcomes for affected patients after 3 months and 6 months are currently awaited.
- Puchalski M
- Kamińska H
- Bartoszek M
- Brzewski M
- Werner B
- Barda N
- Dagan N
- Ben-Shlomo Y
- et al.
A study of cardiac MRI in young athletes recovered from COVID-19 showed a prevalence of myocarditis of 2·1%,
- Daniels CJ
- Rajpal S
- Greenshields JT
- et al.
whereas our post-hoc analysis of myopericarditis in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 with radiological or clinical suspicion of myopericarditis found a prevalence of 1·1% (95% CI 0·5–2·2).
- Accorsi EK
- Britton A
- Fleming-Dutra KE
- et al.
,
particularly for mRNA vaccines, which can be manufactured rapidly.
Just as different population groups have been found to be more susceptible to thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) after COVID-19 vaccination,
- Long B
- Bridwell R
- Gottlieb M
different population groups (in our analysis, those of male sex and younger age) are more susceptible to myopericarditis. Just as there are appropriate strategies to address TTS, reasonable policies—such as preferentially offering a non-mRNA vaccine to males, particularly those younger than 18 years—could be considered to manage the risk of myopericarditis, while considering the overall benefits and harms of the vaccines. These policies will become more crucial as more countries begin offering booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines to more people under the age of 30 years. However, the risk and benefit calculations on such policy-making decisions must take into account the local epidemiology (ie, the incidence rate of COVID-19 infection at the time and location that the decision is being made), whether there are other non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines available, and the risk of morbidity from COVID-19 infection for that particular group, while recognising that such factors and decisions will be dynamic during a pandemic. It is also important to interpret the risks and benefits in the context of the background incidence of myopericarditis across subpopulations—ie, the risk of myopericarditis will depend on the prevailing prevalence of COVID-19 locally and at the time of vaccination.
There are three main strengths of our study. First, with a sample size of more than 400 million vaccine doses, to our knowledge, this study is the largest to quantify the incidence of myopericarditis post-vaccination. Second, we compared the incidence of myopericarditis between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccines, which gives an indication of whether COVID-19 vaccines increase the rate of myopericarditis compared with other routine non-COVID-19 vaccinations. Third, the analyses between subpopulations within those receiving COVID-19 vaccines help to clarify potential at-risk populations and could contribute to driving better vaccination policy-making decisions.
Nonetheless, we recognise several limitations of our analysis. Most of the studies included in our review did not report on outcomes of patients younger than 12 years receiving vaccination against COVID-19, as vaccination of this younger age group is relatively recent. As such, the findings of our review are not generalisable to children in that age group. Additionally, the comparisons made between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccines were made indirectly across studies from different time periods. There are far more sensitive tools (eg, MRI, widespread echocardiography, or biopsy) being used currently that did not play as large a role in diagnosing myopericarditis previously in people receiving non-COVID-19 vaccines. This disparity introduces heterogeneity to the reporting and treatment of myopericarditis, which results in potential confounders within our analysis. There are other important vaccines (including, but not limited to, those against hepatitis, Haemophilus influenzae, pneumococcus, and diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus) that were under-represented in our analysis, suggesting that cases of myopericarditis after these commonly used vaccines occurred very rarely. Furthermore, the 95% CIs for the pooled estimate of non-COVID-19 vaccines were relatively wide, most likely due to two main factors: heterogeneity and variability in the type of vaccine (for which we conducted a subgroup analysis of non-COVID-19 vaccine subtypes to explore as a potential source of heterogeneity), and imprecision resulting from a smaller sample size than that for COVID-19 vaccines. Because COVID-19 vaccines were developed in response to a new global pandemic, they have been administered at an unprecedented rate, with millions of doses given within a short period, unlike any of the comparator non-COVID-19 vaccines. As such, the relative incidence of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination should be interpreted in this context, although it is probably more accurate than the incidence of non-COVID-19 vaccines. Our analysis is also based on study-level data, which limited our analysis of subpopulations. Although we were able to partially account for this by conducting a strata-level meta-regression analysis by age, more granular data are required to better guide the clinical decision-making process. Our analysis also uses data from registries and databases, which are inherently limited by the lack of longitudinal data, and some of the coded cases of myopericarditis might turn out to not have myopericarditis following further investigation of the symptoms. Some studies only reported the number of doses of vaccines that were administered. As a result, we had to analyse the incidence of myopericarditis by doses and not patients. Most of the studies included in our analysis did not report on myocarditis or pericarditis specifically, but grouped both complications under the umbrella term myopericarditis. Nonetheless, these remain the best data available on myopericarditis following vaccination. Additionally, myopericarditis occurring in temporal relation with COVID-19 vaccination cannot always confirm a diagnosis of vaccine-induced myopericarditis, as it is difficult to distinguish it from myopericarditis due to other causes. Finally, our review was unable to account for the disease burden or severity of myopericarditis, which, while usually mild and self-limiting, can take a more fulminant course eventually requiring mechanical circulatory support. There are also other side-effects that were not addressed in this study that might influence a person’s decision to receive a vaccination.
In conclusion, this meta-analysis of more than 400 million doses of vaccines suggests that the overall incidence of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination is similar to that in the published literature on its incidence after influenza vaccination, and is lower than the incidence after live smallpox vaccination. The incidence of myopericarditis in younger males after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is higher than expected by comparison with other age groups. The scale of mass global vaccination and enhanced surveillance might account for the increased reporting of this adverse event in the context of COVID-19 vaccination. Nonetheless, certain subpopulations—those of male sex or younger age and those receiving an mRNA vaccine, particularly the second dose—appear to be at increased risk of myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. These findings are important additions to the conversation when weighing the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination during this pandemic. Although the results of our analysis place the risks of COVID-19 vaccination into perspective, the decision to vaccinate should be informed by appropriately weighing the benefits and harms of COVID-19 vaccination, the local risk of exposure to COVID-19 infection at the time, and the risk of myopericarditis from COVID-19 infection itself.
KR and RRL designed the study and drafted the manuscript. RRL, KR, and FLT contributed to the search strategy, screening of articles, and data collection. RRL and FLT contributed to the risk of bias assessment and made the tables and figures. RRL, BCT, and KR contributed to data analysis and interpretation. KR, RRL, GM, JS, DF, and BCT contributed to critical revision of manuscript for intellectually important content. All authors provided critical conceptual input, interpreted the data analysis, and read and approved the final draft of the manuscript. RRL, FLT, and KR accessed and verified the data. RRL and KR were responsible for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
